CEO of Robin AI Claims AI is Not to Blame for Mistakes Made in Court

A human, not a technological, solution is necessary to reduce the likelihood of “AI hallucinations,” according to Richard Robinson, CEO of Robin AI, an AI legal copilot. He stressed the need for competent supervision for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools by legal practitioners.

While AI is impressive, Robinson told Cointelegraph that it can’t replace human judgment and other attributes. Although it has the ability to automate repetitious processes, it is important to verify its output before considering it a completed product.

Artificial intelligence (AI) hallucinations occur when AI systems produce erroneous or misleading results, analyses, or forecasts. It draws attention to the fact that AI algorithms may make mistakes or misunderstandings when they generate results that don’t match reality or expectations.

Researchers from China’s University of Science and Technology and Tencent’s YouTu Lab created a method to counteract artificial intelligence hallucinations in October 2023.

Built on top of Anthropic’s Claude 2.1 AI assistant, RobinAI is a tailored AI tool that has been taught to comprehend legal texts. According to the announcement made by Robin AI on Wednesday, the financial firm Temasek of Singapore was the lead investor in a $26 million Series B round of fundraising.

CEO of Robin AI Claims AI is Not to Blame for Mistakes Made in Court

Since the company’s technology is centered on assisting lawyers with their work and not replacing people, the CEO indicated that the company does not agree that AI dehumanizes legal services. Robinson chimed in:

“We called our company Robin (i.e., partner to Batman!) and called our product a copilot because we believe this technology is about complementing and supporting lawyers rather than replacing them.”

In regards to the decision to select Anthropic as the launch partner rather than OpenAI, Robinson clarified that Robin AI determined that the characteristics of its broad language model, namely a more expansive context window, were more appropriate for evaluating lengthy and intricate legal papers.

In the court’s annual report, which was released on December 31, 2023, Chief Justice John Roberts of the United States Supreme Court made the prediction that AI will have a major influence on the legal profession.

If the current judicial system is to achieve its goals of applying the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures to seek the “just, speedy, and inexpensive” resolution of cases, Roberts claims that AI can “indisputably assist” in this endeavor.

If you obtained pleasure from this technology article, you may potentially find the subsequent content equally enjoyable:

Leave a Comment